Suzuki: Renewable energy isn’t perfect, but it’s far better than fossil fuels

Writing in the Huffington Post, scientist/author/broadcaster David Suzuki says that any real comparison between oilsands and lithium batteries shows that oilsands products are by far the most destructive.

“In their efforts to discredit renewable energy and support continued fossil fuel burning, many anti-environmentalists have circulated a dual image purporting to compare a lithium mine with an oilsands operation. It illustrates the level of dishonesty to which some will stoop to keep us on our current polluting, climate-disrupting path (although in some cases it could be ignorance.)

The image is a poor attempt to prove that lithium batteries and renewable energy are worse for the environment than energy from oilsands bitumen. The first problem is that the “lithium mine” is actually BHP Billiton’s Escondida copper mine in Chile (the world’s largest.) The bottom image is of an Alberta oilsands operation, but it’s an in situ underground facility and doesn’t represent the enormous open-pit mining operations used to extract most bitumen.”

Read the full article at The Huffington Post
Visit the David Suzuki Foundation website
Image: CBC Nature of Things

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: